The Research & Development Unit is currently involved in a number of research projects, ranging in size and scope, concerning a variety of issues relevant to the practice of law enforcement in Texas. The purpose of this page is to summarize these projects.
Project Staff:
Kadee L. Brinser, Doctoral student, Sam Houston State University
Larry T. Hoover, Professor, Sam Houston State University
Rita J. Watkins, Executive Director, LEMIT
Policing continues to be a male-dominated field. With increasing gender-equality in society as the backdrop, this study measures gender equality in policing. The three main focus areas are performance, perceptions, and promotion. First, field performance is explored through a quantitative analysis of data from the Police Research Center to determine the types of calls for service female police officers are assigned, the length of time spent on each call, and other relevant factors that may differ between genders. Second, the study will measure perceptions of gender inequality and factors that may contribute to a lack of female acceptance in policing. Last, the promotion process is explored to determine factors associated with motivation to move up the ranks and the potential existence of a glass ceiling in police organizations. LEMIT is assisting in the data collection process by facilitating online surveys and telephone interviews. The research will provide an understanding of dynamics female police officers face.
Project Status:
October 2015 through current
Project Staff:
William Wells, Professor, Sam Houston State University
Rita Watkins, Executive Director, LEMIT
William King, Associate Professor, Sam Houston State University
Yudu Li, Doctoral student, Sam Houston State University
This study seeks to understand the trends and patterns in police chief turnover. Multiple data sources are being combined to understand how often new police chiefs are appointed each year in Texas and to understand the factors associated with police chief turnover. Little systematic information is currently available about this topic in the United States. The data being collected as part of this project will be used for Mr. Yudu Lis dissertation. Preliminary results are expected in late 2015.
Project Staff:
William Wells, Professor, Sam Houston State University
Brad Campbell, Doctoral student, Sam Houston State University
Stryker Swindle, Master's degree student, Sam Houston State University
Yudu Li, Doctoral student, Sam Houston State University
Project Report #1: Sampling, Research Design, and Data Collection
Project Report #2: Analysis and Results
The Houston Police Department has partnered with LEMIT and the College of Criminal Justice at Sam Houston State University to conduct an ambitious experiment. The study is only the second randomized field experiment to test different procedures for administering photo spreads and live lineups to crime victims and eyewitnesses. Results will inform future LEMIT programming and provide evidence Texas police agencies can use when making decisions about eyewitness identification policies and procedures.
Project Staff:
William Wells, Professor, Sam Houston State University
Cortney Franklin, Associate Professor, Sam Houston State University
Project Status:
April 2011 through October 2015
National Institute of Justice Project Page
This is a study funded by the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, to better understand the factors that have led to the generation of sexual assault kits that are never submitted to crime labs for testing. The research also seeks to understand how sexual assault investigations and prosecutions can be enhanced, in broad terms. The Houston Police Department recognizes greater evidence testing must occur so the department sought federal funds to help solve this problem. Sam Houston State University is the lead research partner on this project and has been collaborating with HPD personnel to identify the sources of problems and ways to overcome problems. A team of researchers from the Institute on Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence at UT – Austin is working on aspects of the project that focus on victim notification and integrating victim advocates into responses. Once viable responses are identified it will be possible to implement solutions and measure their effectiveness. Beginning in early 2013, HPD began the process of launching responses to enhance offender accountability and services for victims of sexual assault.
Project Staff:
William King, Associate Professor, Sam Houston State University
William Wells, Professor, Sam Houston State University
Charles Katz, Professor, Arizona State University
Edward Maguire, Professor, American University
James Frank, Professor, University of Cincinnati
Matt Matusiak, Assistant Professor, University of Central Florida
Project Status:
January 2011 through June 2013
This is a study funded by the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, to better understand how ballistic evidence is processed and utilized by police agencies across the United States. Innovative imaging methods have made it easy to compare ballistic evidence collected from multiple crime scenes. These comparisons allow investigators and crime analysts to understand whether the same gun has been used in multiple shootings. The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives manages a national database of images collected from police departments across the country. This database is known as NIBIN: National Integrated Ballistic Information Network. Very little evidence exists about whether local police departments are making effective use of imaging technologies and NIBIN.
The research team analyzed national data on how NIBIN is being used and collected detailed data from 10 sites that appear to be using this technology in effective and innovative ways. The research team examined the way ballistic evidence testing results have been used during criminal investigations. One purpose of the project is to produce information about best practices in using ballistic evidence. Findings from this study can inform police departments across Texas about how ballistic evidence can be used effectively.
Project Staff:
William King, Associate Professor, Sam Houston State University
Matt Matusiak, Assistant Professor, University of Central Florida
Brad Campbell, Doctoral student, Sam Houston State University
Project Status:
Survey data collection and analysis is ongoing
Five survey modules are being used to measure: 1) inter-organizational communication in law enforcement, 2) critical incidents and crisis in policing, 3) time allocation and routine tasks of chiefs, 4) employee issues, problems, and misconduct, and 5) the organizational environment of Texas law enforcement agencies. The project entails an ongoing data collection effort to gather information from police executives. We will explore pressing issues facing law enforcement executives. The modules can be altered or replaced with new modules as exigencies dictate. Dr. Matusiak used these data for his dissertation project that was successfully completed in the spring 2013 semester. A brief summary of results can be found here.
Project Staff:
Larry Hoover, Professor, Sam Houston State University
Ling Ren, Associate Professor, Sam Houston State University
William Wells, Professor, Sam Houston State University
Yan Zhang, Associate Professor, Sam Houston State University
Solomon Zhao, Professor, Sam Houston State University
Project Status:
Research projects completed and ongoing
Partially funded through LEMIT, this initiative represents an ongoing series of projects between a team of researchers, led by Dr. Larry Hoover, from the College of Criminal Justice and the six largest police departments in Texas. This is part of the Executive Issues Major Cities program offered by LEMIT. The program provides professional development courses for chiefs of the six largest police departments in Texas. A goal of this research initiative is to generate sound and practical research results that police departments in Texas can use.
Dallas Police Department (2007 2008)
The purpose was to evaluate the crime reduction efforts made by the Dallas Police Department (DPD) patrol divisions in the designated hot spots (target areas). In January 2008 SHSU and DPD identified 21 target areas or hot spots that accounted for 25% of all violent crimes but merely 5.6% of the city's geographic area. Among them, 20% of violent crimes were contributed by the top 12 hot spots. Then Chief David Kunkle ordered patrol division commanders to develop and submit an action plan of how to reduce crime in their respective hot spots. Interventions began in May, 2008, at both the Division level and by the agency's Crime Disruption tactical unit.
SHSU compiled 120 weeks of pre-intervention period data (from January 1, 2006 to April 30, 2008) and 36 weeks of intervention period data (from May 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008). Time-series analysis was used in the analysis, which focused upon the worst 12 hot spots. The time-series analysis showed that there was a significant decline of violent crimes in 3 of the 12 hot spots. More optimistically, there was a significant decrease in property crimes in 7 of the 12 hot spots. Overall, the findings suggested that the intervention in DPD was more effective in reducing property crimes than violent crimes.
Houston Police Department (2007 2009) Published findings
HPD launched its Crime Reduction Unit (CRU) in November 2007 under the leadership of Chief Harold Hurtt. The research team worked closely with Executive Assistant Chiefs Munden and Oettmeier to measure the CRU impact. Results showed the CRU had a measureable impact on property crimes in the areas it worked. In addition, the gun possession arrests made by CRU officers in a small number of beats were associated with reductions in crimes committed with firearms in those beats. A series of research reports and journal articles resulted from this project.
Houston Police Department (2009 2011) Published findings
In 2009 HPD and the research team began discussions about whether a hot spots policing strategy would be effective in Houston. Those discussions led to a sophisticated research protocol the HPD implemented throughout 2010. The purpose was to answer research questions about whether proactive, directed patrols in crime hot spots would reduce crime and whether differing deployment periods were more or less effective. In addition, the research protocol would provide an understanding whether crime would rise after the proactive patrols moved out of a high crime location. The descriptive results are mixed, revealing trends that suggest additional patrols were not effective in reducing suppressible street crimes in meaningful ways.